Complete the comparison tables on urinary disorders and bowel disorders

Complete the comparison tables on urinary disorders and bowel disorders

Complete the comparison tables on urinary disorders and bowel disorders.

NUR2571_Module 01_Comparison of Bowel Elimination Disorder _v2.docx

Comparison of Bowel Elimination Disorders

 

Diarrhea

Bowel   Obstruction

Hemorrhoids

 

Pathophysiology

 

Etiology

 

Clinical   Manifestations

 

Interventions 

NUR2571_Module 01_Comparison of Urinary Elimination Disorder_v2.docx
Comparison of Urinary Elimination Disorders:

 

Stress   Incontinence

Benign   Prostatic Hypertrophy

Pyelonephritis

Pathophysiology

Etiology

Clinical   Manifestations

Interventions

Needs at least one citation and reference
Interventions should have at LEAST:
Three things you would monitor/reassess,
Three things you would do or action
Three things you would teach your patient
The medication you would administer

  • attachment

    NUR2571_Module01_ComparisonofUrinaryEliminationDisorder_v2.docx
  • attachment

    NUR2571_Module01_ComparisonofBowelEliminationDisorder_v2.docx
 

Define innate vs. acquired immunity.

Discussion Topic

Top of Form

Activity Time

3 hour Additional Time for Study, Research, and Reflection: 1 hour

Directions:

For this discussion, consider the role of the LPN and the RN in the nursing process. How would the LPN and RN collaborate to develop the nursing plan of care to ensure the patient is achieving their goal? What are the role expectations for the LPN and RN in the nursing process?

Use at least one credible resource to support your discussion (topic). For example, a credible resource could be the State Board of Nursing website, a textbook, or a journal article.

Be sure to use in-text citations and list your references in APA format at the end of your discussion.

You can find useful resources for APA and writing in the School of Nursing Guide,

https://guides.rasmussen.edu/nursing/apaandwriting

Have questions about APA? Visit the online APA Guide, https://guides.rasmussen.edu/apa

How do I know if a source is credible? https://rasmussen.libanswers.com/faq/32400

 

What are the differentials for acute liver failure?

You are the critical care nurse practitioner covering the ICU at a busy teaching hospital. You are called to accept a transfer from an outside hospital. The patient is a 35-year-old native American female who lives on the Navaho Reservation. Prior medical history includes obesity, T2DM, and ETOH use/abuse. Patient presented to outside hospital complaining of RUQ abdominal pain, nausea/vomiting, jaundice, and confusion.

Per the patient’s husband, she developed nausea/vomiting with body aches 3-4 days ago. She “felt like she had the flu” and was taking Tylenol for the body aches.

Labs from the outside hospital are significant for:

  • WBC 12.8 Gl 86 Tbili 20.4
  • HGB 9.5 BUN 14 AST 946
  • HCT 28.3 Cr 0.83 ALT 1110
  • PLT 73 Na 149 ALP 142
  • K 4.7
  • PT 34.6 Cl 112 Lactic acid 12.4
  • INR 3.6 CO2 13 Ammonia 281

Patient’s mental status quickly deteriorated, and she was intubated for airway protection and is being transferred to your facility for higher level care.

Respond to each of the questions below and support your answer with two or three peer-reviewed resources.

  1. What are the differentials for acute liver failure?
  2. What potential risk factors does this patient have for liver failure?
  3. What are the diagnostic criteria for acute liver failure?
  4. What are your priorities in the medical management of acute liver failure?
  5. What is involved in the pretransplant work-up for liver transplant?
  6. Why do you want to avoid transfusions in a potential transplant candidate?
 

how does Nasal Sanitizer compared with Nasal Ointment affect lowering the incidence of MRSA infection within their intensive care stay?

how does Nasal Sanitizer compared with Nasal Ointment affect lowering the incidence of MRSA infection within their intensive care stay?

Do a critique of the structure of the PICOT question. Is it in the correct PICOT format? Is the question specific enough? Is the patient population specific? Is the intervention a nursing intervention? Are there too many outcomes? Does the question make sense? Provide colleagues with suggestion on how to improve the PICOT question. No medical interventions!

PICOT Question

            In Adult Intensive Care Patients, how does Nasal Sanitizer compared with Nasal Ointment affect lowering the incidence of MRSA infection within their intensive care stay?

 

Analyze and assess the culture of your healthcare setting as it relates to patient safety.

Module 01 Content

  1. To improve your writing skills, first you have to identify areas that you need to work on in order to make yourself a better writer. Over the first two modules, you will work on a short writing sample that you will share with your course faculty member so that he or she can identify areas for development in your writing.
    For this assignment:
    Click the link that follows to download a list of six linked articles from the Online Library. Select and read one of the articles.

    Diagnostic Writing Samples Articles

    In a Word document:

    • Type the article’s title and the name of the article’s author.
    • Write a one-sentence summary of the article’s main idea.
    • Submit this document as your assignment.
  • attachment

    DiagnosticWritingSamplesArticles1.docx
 

 What are the strengths and limitations of the study?

A research critique demonstrates your ability to critically read an investigative study. For this assignment, choose a research article related to nursing.

·         Articles used for this assignment cannot be used for the other assignments (students should find new research articles for each new assignment).

·         The selected articles should be original research articles. Review articles, concept analysis, meta-analysis, meta-synthesis, integrative review, and systemic review should not be used.

·         Mixed-methods studies should not be used.

·         Dissertations should not be used.

Your critique should include the following:

Research Problem/Purpose

·         State the problem clearly as it is presented in the report.

·         Have the investigators placed the study problem within the context of existing knowledge?

·         Will the study solve a problem relevant to nursing?

·         State the purpose of the research.

Review of the Literature

·         Identify the concepts explored in the literature review.

·         Were the references current? If not, what do you think the reasons are?

·         Was there evidence of reflexivity in the design (qualitative)?

Theoretical Framework

·         Are the theoretical concepts defined and related to the research?

·         Does the research draw solely on nursing theory or does it draw on theory from other disciplines?

·         Is a theoretical framework stated in this research piece?

·         If not, suggest one that might be suitable for the study.

Variables/Hypotheses/Questions/Assumptions (Quantitative)

·         What are the independent and dependent variables in this study?

·         Are the operational definitions of the variables given? If so, are they concrete and measurable?

·         Is the research question or the hypothesis stated? What is it?

Conceptual Underpinnings, Research Questions (Qualitative)

·         Are key concepts defined conceptually?

·         Is the philoosoophical basis, underlying tradition, conoceptual framework, or ideological orientation made explicit and is it appropriate for the problem?

·         Are research questions explicitly stated? Are the questions consistent with the study’s philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation?

Methodology

·         What type of design (quantitative, qualitative, and type) was used in this study?

·         Was inductive or deductive reasoning used in this study?

·         State the sample size and study population, sampling method, and study setting.

·         Did the investigator choose a probability or non-probability sample?

·         State the type of reliability and the validity of the measurement tools (quantitative only)

Qualitative studies (answer the following questions in addition to those above except the last bulleted item)

·         Were the methods of gathering data appropriate?

·         Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?

·         Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations and were they recorded in an appropriate fashion?

·         Was a sufficient amount of data gathered?

·         Was the data of sufficient depth and richness?

Were ethical considerations addressed? Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?

Data Analysis

·         What data analysis tool was used?

·         Was saturation achieved? (qualitative)

·         How were the results presented in the study?

·         Were the data management (e.g., coding) and data analysis methods sufficiently described? (qualitative)

·         Identify at least one (1) finding.

Summary/Conclusions, Implications, and Recommendations

·         Do the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data?

·         Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?

·         Were methods used to enhance the trustworthiness of the data (and analysis) and was the description of those methods adequate?

·         Are there clear explanation of the boundaries/limitations, thick description, audit trail?

·         What are the strengths and limitations of the study?

·         In terms of the findings, can the researcher generalize to other populations? Explain.

·         Evaluate the findings and conclusions as to their significance for nursing (both qualitative and quantitative).

The body of your paper should be 4–6 double-spaced pages plus a cover page and a reference page. The critique must be attached to the article and follow APA guidelines.

 

Select the case study “John Winters”

Select the case study “John Winters”

Access the DxR Clinician website

Access the DxR Clinician website at https://gcu.dxrclinician.com/

Select the applicable folders labeled: gcu_npstudents_patients(3)

Select the case study “John Winters”

Upon clicking on the case, you will see the “Enter Case” button at the top of the page. Select “Enter Page.” Under “Name,” enter First Initial, Last Name, all in lower case. Leave password blank. This will give you entry into the case study. Initials are MH

After completing the case study, list your potential differentials for this patient.

 

Review this Twitter and share your thoughts on this issue with the class.

The DNP practice scholar has the skills, knowledge, experience, and ability to be a strong political advocate. Yet, despite this collective awareness, many nurses avoid becoming political engaged in health policy within the community and in some cases, within the organizations where they work.

This week, the focus was on understanding healthcare systems and the role of the DNP practice scholar as advocate for the patient, the community, and joining the national healthcare conversation. Reflect upon the development of your political competency and address the following:

  1. Consider a time when you had the opportunity to become politically involved in an issue (at work or in your community). If you pursued the opportunity what were the results? If you did not, what were the reasons?
  2. As you reflect on this week’s learning activities and your role as a practice scholar, discuss the area of your political competency that needs further development.
  3. Review this Twitter and share your thoughts on this issue with the class.  [ We are seeing +100k #COVID19 cases per day in the U.S. Last week, over 99% were #DeltaVariant. At least 19 states have confirmed cases of #OmicronVariant. We must act together to address current cases and prepare for the possibility of more Omicronhttps://bit.ly/3ous7di. ]
  4. Compose a 140-character Tweet that shares your thoughts and opinions about the Tweet. Be mindful Twitter only allows 140 characters (be concise). Share this Tweet in this discussion.

Instructions:

Use an APA 7 style and a minimum of 250 words. Provide support from a minimum of at least three (3) scholarly sources. The scholarly source needs to be: 1) evidence-based, 2) scholarly in nature, 3) Sources should be no more than five years old (published within the last 5 years), and 4) an in-text citation. citations and references are included when information is summarized/synthesized and/or direct quotes are used, in which APA style standards apply. Include the Doi or URL link.

• Textbooks are not considered scholarly sources. 

• Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used

 

What age group of students were affected the most by the online learning environment?

What age group of students were affected the most by the online learning environment?

Goal: To assess own leadership skills.

Content Requirements:

  1. Determine your preferred leadership style using The Foundation of Nursing Leadership’s Leadership Development – Test One – What is your leadership style? (Links to an external site.)
  2. Analyze your leadership’s skills based on your self-assessment.
  3. Identify strengths and opportunities for improvement based on your self-assessment.
  4. Create an action plan to address self-assessment capitalizing on strengths and addressing opportunities for improvement.

Submission Instructions:

  •  2 – 3 pages in length, excluding the title, abstract (must include what this doc is about) and references page.PLEASE WRITE in Third Person.
  • Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published from 2017 up to now) scholarly journal articles, books, or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work. PLEASE cite them at the end of the paragraph.
  • Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style 7th edition
  • NO WEBSITES ALLOWED. Please include DOI, Page numbers, etc.
 

anxiety disorders

discuss:

Doctor of Nursing Practice is a degree that requires a student to assess for evidence-based literature and to help translate the findings into practice for better patient care and outcomes. With this said, it is vital to know how to appropriately assess evidence-based information to ensure the legitimacy of information (Dearholt & Dang, 2021). For this discussion, the topic selected as a clinical problem would be anxiety disorders. I chose this topic because, as a psychiatric and mental health nurse practitioner, about 99% of the patients I see struggle with anxiety alongside their mental health diagnosis. Anxiety is a debilitating disease that targets both genders, but women are diagnosed two times more than men (Bandelow, Michaelis, & Wedekind, 2017). Anxiety is a huge comorbid in various psychiatric conditions and part of anyone’s life. I went straight to the websites that I have trusted throughout my nursing career in search of my clinical problem, and they are PubMed®, Google Scholar, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). Another site explored is The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Looking through The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), their information is up to date. For example, the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine has topics on how anxiety is affected by the COVID-19 pandemic (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, n.d.). This is an intriguing topic because we are facing this pandemic right now, and it has been known to impact patients who struggle with mental health issues. For AHRQ, although some of the information about anxiety is outdated, I can see at the end of the website that it has been updated in 2021 and reviewed (This proves that information is as up-to-date as possible. For PubMed®, Google Scholar, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), I find several pieces of literature in terms of anxiety but to ensure legitimacy, I need to make sure they are peer-reviewed. To explain discrepancies, it is important to take note of the author’s credentials, date of publication, any references utilized for the information, who the audience/readers are, if the evidence is cited in the investigation, and if there are any biases (Texas Gateway for Online Resources (n.d.).

200 words